(Hour 1a, b) Rich went to last night’s Manchester Dog Park meeting and shared the crazy details. It’s hard to believe that we’re spending as much time on this stuff at City Hall and on our adorable little radio show as we are, but hey, at least these people aren’t boring! Just be careful where you step when you’re at odds with the Friends of the Manchester Dog Park.
More in the On Air News Read
NOTE Posted on 12/8/2013: Girard At Large releases Facebook posts from the Friends of the Manchester Dog Park closed Facebook group page to verify commentaries and news stories. Memo to Alderman at-Large Joe Kelly Levasseur: Yes, Joe, our sources ARE that good and always have been, much to your chagrin, I know. Regards to all: RH Girard
Jon C. Hopwood contemplates crashing the Manchester Dog Park Association’s annual meeting. Ald. Levasseur chimes in. Nice try to cover yourselves toward the end, gents!
Posts on a thread that has comments from before and after the MDPA’s meeting, including from Bethanie Saint Laurent, stating she hoped to be intimidating, among other things. There are several posts from the hardcore core of the MDPA’s opponents which give an unvarnished look at this group. Oh, there’s a reference her to taping the meeting. Interesting…
Here is the thread started by Saint Laurent after the meeting, complaining about it and stating she recorded it. Lots of comments from the core anti MDPA group. Note Levasseur was very active in this thread and the one immediately above.
Finally, here is the letter written by the insurance agency employee Levasseur called about the MDPA’s insurance policy.
The Manchester Dog Park Association’s Executive Committee is part of the Board of Directors according to the the MDPA Bylaws submitted by Phil Greazzo to the Board of Mayor and Aldermen Committee on Accounts, Enrollment and Revenue Administration. As regards their term of office, the bylaws say “ALL BOD members”. Text follows: Article IV Board of Directors: Section 1: Size. The Board of Directors (BOD) will consist of a (5) member Executive Committee and shall have up to (4) non-Executive Committee members. Section 2: Terms. All BOD members shall serve one year terms running from January 1 to December 31, until such time as they resign their position, or at such time that the Executive Committee votes to remove them from the BOD.
I say, my dear Sherlock, “Who let the dogs out?”
It appears that the “Enemies of the Manchester Dog Park” got their just deserts. God Bless their pointy little heads !
I am afraid the “Enemies of the Manchester Dog Park” will have no recourse but to resume their normal habits, to wit, using their “journalistic talents” to expound upon the glory of the Kardashian sisters, fraternizing with clandestinely effeminate bar-crawlers and doing their level best to avoid buttocks imprints and the residue of controlled substances from a local bar top. You see, dear Sherlock, I know far more about you and your friends than you can possibly imagine.
Here’s a perfect example of the kind of B.S. Tammy Simmons spews blowing smoke and using mirrors to make an excuse to make doing nothing sound good with the dog park. She claims after the fact when their own MPDA facebook page says a failed attempt was made this summer to file for the 501(c)(3) according to Kevin Roux that now they can’t file this complicated 40 page application document (which is form 1023) without the help of a lawyer. If she had really looked at the document at all to claim it was 40 pages long instead of just making that number up she would have known that the document is only 26 pages long and out of those 26 pages 14 of them don’t need to be filled out at all because those pages apply to being a charitable organization that is related to churches, schools, hospitals, housing for the elderly, handicapped, or low income, or a charity that supplies support to other organizations. The dog park is none of these so only needs to complete 12 out of those 26 pages. Only 12 pages to fill out not the bogus 40 Tammy claims. Also last year they were claiming they had another application to use as a guide to fill out the form from another dog park and free advice from a lawyer. My my how the story keeps changing when you know the history of the dog park.
Ah, speak of the Devil and the Devil appears! It sounds like one of the “Enemies of the Manchester Dog Park” has arisen to lodge yet another complaint. Does anyone else find it odd that grown men have allowed themselves to become so distraught and hysterical over something as mundane as a dog park? I pray they find a new hobby to occupy their minds before they are overcome yet again with the vapors..
Rich Girard, on his television show and now here in “print”, admits to hacking a Facebook account. A note to Phil Greazzo: Your self-appointed “in-house counsel” doesn’t seem to understand much about privacy or federal law. Do you remember what they told us when we went to basic training, Phil, on relying on the advice of “Barrack Lawyers”? (It wasn’t the actual word the drill instructors used; it was a variation of “outhouse”.) You need to sever your connection with the “Iago” of Manchester. He is a hot mess. Did you watch him during the broadcast of the last show, gnashing his hands together, fighting to keep self-control? It was liking watch the early David Cronenberg movie “Scanners”. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YI3NoBeNwfk
Some nonprofessional advice to the person posting on the Girard at Large comment boards as “John Watson” — when you next step out of the closet and look in the mirror, think of the psychological concepts of “Projection” and “Repression” and then go seek help from a qualified therapist, immediately. Someone with so much anger and rage (and likely, self-hatred generated from repression) is not only a danger to themselves, but to their families and any one else they are close to. Seriously.
“Nice try to cover yourselves toward the end, gents!” Rich Girard: What world do you live in? Are you delusional? Are you, honestly, as lost in your own little world of lies and self-deception as has become increasingly obvious? The posters on our site knew there were hostile people on our page who would run back and tell Phil & Tammy everything. The one thing we didn’t think that was you would be stupid enough to violate the Faceboook Terms of Service agreement and federal cybersecurity and privacy laws. You really are a dummkopf, Girard. You have the soul of a factotum and the talent of stenographer, crossed with the morals of a Gestapo snitch. Who is your patron saint, Girard: Judas Iscariot? The “mole” you had doing your dirty work is as guilty as you are. You are a dangerous, reckless menace.
It is humorous to read complaints from someone who has made a living writing horrible things about others. Perhaps you are getting a very small taste of the sorts of things you have been dishing out. You seem to have no reservations about using several different media to spread innuendo and false accusations against someone for purely partisan political gain. Regarding your other point about the concepts of “projection” and “repression”, you show your lack of insight once again as to my identity. Our fair state has a marriage equality law thanks, in part, to people who believe as I do and acted upon those beliefs to ensure the equality of all before the law. This, however, does not negate the low character of those with whom you wish to associate. Do you not grow tired of promulgating attacks against those on the opposite side of the political fence? Again I ask: Why would a grown man become so hysterically unhinged over a dog park? Why would he make a laughingstock of himself with wild accusations that cannot possibly be true? Could it be that he is hiding his own basic dishonesty? Perhaps this is really about the “projection” of one who has a problem with the truth.